Japanese Modelling & Japan Rail Enthusiasts Forum
LoginRegister

ForumHelp

JNSwiki
May 24, 2012, 11:31:38 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Search  Search for  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ballasting Your Track  (Read 721 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Shashinka 
鉄子の旅
Global Moderator
*****
*****
*
Offline Offline


Red Express


WWW
« on: September 02, 2011, 10:22:44 pm »

After laying track, do you ballast? (Go to hell option is for those of us who do, and wish we didn't!)
Logged

Japan Rail Modelers of Washington DC - http://www.japanrailmodelers.org/
Japanese Railway Photography Site - http://www.shashinka-ichiban.com/j-trains
Japanese Railway Photography Blog - http://shashinkaichiban1.wordpress.com/
keiman 

*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male

Mike


« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2011, 10:40:48 pm »



Does that answer your question?
Logged

Trams, collection of B-Train shorty's and a lot of luck using a Maximum radius 140mm
Shashinka 
鉄子の旅
Global Moderator
*****
*****
*
Offline Offline


Red Express


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2011, 10:42:45 pm »

Do note, I share the same sentiment.
Logged

Japan Rail Modelers of Washington DC - http://www.japanrailmodelers.org/
Japanese Railway Photography Site - http://www.shashinka-ichiban.com/j-trains
Japanese Railway Photography Blog - http://shashinkaichiban1.wordpress.com/
bill937ca 

Offline Offline

Gender: Male


« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2011, 12:01:09 am »

I use Tomix track and because of the texture I'm painting a the roadbed on my train layout rather than ballasting.  There isn't much room behind the rails for ballast with roadbed track for one thing.
Logged

Tomix N Gauge Track and Trains
http://jtrains.wordpress.com/
scott 

*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male

noritetsu otaku


« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2011, 02:58:33 am »


I ballasted the track at our main station, but I may never do it again.
Logged
inobu 

*
Offline Offline


« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2011, 03:08:53 am »

UNitrack is the last thing you want to ballast. The track is too high.

This is what we envision in our minds which Fine track and Flessman can support.


Those of us that use unitrack this is what we don't realize.




Kato's unitrack is more in line with this configuration


Where the ballast is above the basic terrain. When we try to fill the gap it looks funny.

Just imagine if the ballast was filled to the edge if the road.

The ballast should not go out but a few mm from the base. Unitrack is hard to do correctly. They should do away with the glossy ties too.

Logged
keitaro 

Online Online

Gender: Male


« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2011, 05:54:21 am »

few mm form the base ?? lol mines like 1.6cm from the base. I did this cause of wanting to put signs and atc equipment along the track   you may think it's odd to do so much out but when the fence is up and the equipment is sitting next to fence it doesn't look so bad.

I got 2 packs of the atc parts but have yet to put them down but when i do i will post a pic. plus i'll have shrubs/weeds and such along the fence making it not look as wide as it does. You will have a heart attack when i post my sidings pic lol.!!!

Will post here later. Had 7 heinekens for fathers day lunch and my camera holding skills are a bit off.  occasion14

I have done the ballast for 80% of my track just a touch to go. After a fail on a switch I decided to skip them  

edit pic
« Last Edit: September 04, 2011, 06:25:32 am by keitaro » Logged

dreaming of a bigger layout
KenS 

*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male


WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2011, 06:45:25 am »

UNitrack is the last thing you want to ballast. The track is too high.

Not necessarily true.  You can make Unitack look lower by filling around it with ballast (assuming the surrounding terrain is higher than the roadbed under the Unitrack).  I've seen layouts that did that to good effect.

However, I use Unitrack to avoid ballasting, so seems like entirely too much work to me.  If I were going to ballast, I'd be using some kind of flex track to gain the advantage of more custom trackwork.  I've done that in HO, and really don't want to do it in N.
Logged

Sumida Crossing An N-Scale Japanese-Themed Urban Railroad
Martijn Meerts 
Administrator
******
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male


WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2011, 11:43:29 am »

I do ballast track, but I can't say it's my favorite part of the hobby ;)

However, a well ballasted bit of track definitely looks real good.
Logged

Mixed Japanese N-scale: http://www.jr-chiisai.net
Era III German 0-scale: http://blackforest.jr-chiisai.net
Dani 

Offline Offline

Gender: Male


WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2011, 12:35:01 pm »

I use Peco code 55, and I'll ballast and paint rails. I'm still testing different paints (Tamiya XF64 and Humbrol 160 seems to be the best by the moment for rails) and ballast (Woodland Scenics for sure).

Logged

m(_ _)m

Club N Caldes de Montbui: http://clubncaldes.blogspot.com
inobu 

*
Offline Offline


« Reply #10 on: September 05, 2011, 03:15:35 pm »

You guys are kinda collaborating my comment. There is so much more you have to do to Unitrack it becomes such a pain. Blending the color, trying to paint over the dart semi glossy ties, one change affects something else. I'm not saying it can't be done just really hard and time consuming to get it right.

There are just some track that just don't take ballasting very well. I'm working on a project now and just dread trying to get it done.

Inobu
« Last Edit: September 05, 2011, 03:21:50 pm by inobu » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v.1.0.6 beta 2 © Bloc

Problems? Simply email "help" at "jnsforum" dot "com"!
Click here to lend your support to: JNSForum.com Autumn 2012 Maintenance and make a donation at www.pledgie.com !
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Twitter Mod 1.3 created by 2by2host.com - a web hosting company
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.188 seconds with 42 queries.