Jump to content

Interesting bridge on the Kansai Main Line


Kiha66

Recommended Posts

Neat use of recycling.  It looks like they did something similar on the next segment on the opposite side of the river from the tunnel, where it looks like they could only build a pier on one side of the track - note the angled catenary bridge.

 

In the first photo, it looks like they used old rail as a fencing material.

 

Link to comment

If I'd seen that on a layout I'd laugh at it but as they used to say in Model Railroader "there's a prototype for everything".

Link to comment

Interesting, wonder why they did it though, the river doesn't look like it would be navigable so why not just build a pier in the river?

Link to comment

One possible reason I thought of is that this river might be susceptible to seasonal strong current, and if there are frequently large trees in the river during those periods, repeated impacts could over time weaken a centrally placed pier.  Many stone piers were built with up-river facing V's to help prevent trees from getting stuck on a pier, with continual water pressure against the tree possibly impacting the integrity of the pier.  Another - perhaps more likely, reason was the difficulty of diverting the main flow to allow construction of a central pier at this location?  Or, maybe they were removing the truss span from somewhere else and some young engineer had an aha moment . . . .  Clearly, whatever the reason was, they must have thought it was valid, or they wouldn't have built four piers instead of one  ;-)

Edited by velotrain
fix typo
Link to comment

Thats a very good point, I know in Kyushu last year there was a bridge that was toppled by typhoon flow and debris.  I find it interesting they just didn't make the main span longer to cover that part, perhaps the curve of the bridge made this the preferred alternative.

Link to comment

Also suggestive that this river is liable to extreme changes in flow, notice how high the markings go on the water level gauge next to the truss section, and the red warning line at roughly the same height as the top of the truss piers.  Of course, this could well represent concerns for downstream locations vs. this particular structure.

 

Too bad it wouldn't align with other modules, as it would make an intriguing (long) T-Trak scene.

 

Someone should start a Fremo-Trak group!

 

 

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, velotrain said:

Also suggestive that this river is liable to extreme changes in flow, notice how high the markings go on the water level gauge next to the truss section, and the red warning line at roughly the same height as the top of the truss piers.  Of course, this could well represent concerns for downstream locations vs. this particular structure.

 

Too bad it wouldn't align with other modules, as it would make an intriguing (long) T-Trak scene.

 

I bet you could compress the truss bridge enough to just barely fit a T track model.  Perhaps if you used through girder instead of deck type of the prototype, although another inch or two would greatly add to the scene.  It seems like kato's new tall bridge piers  then a small truss bridge with the normal height piers would work very well.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, katoftw said:

https://www.google.com.au/maps/@34.5790244,135.6695528,3a,75y,309.66h,99.67t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svq7ecBDdUGLjSrnbX8Uvqg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?dcr=0

 

They have actually done the cross support three time on this same bridge.  the example given.  Once over the road and further away from the tunnel portal side.

 

Thanks for finding the street view, interesting that the cross supports seem to be later additions halfway between the single tall piers.  I wonder why the change. 

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, velotrain said:

Too bad it wouldn't align with other modules, as it would make an intriguing (long) T-Trak scene.

 

Someone should start a Fremo-Trak group!

 

 

You can freemo on modules and the just have end modules that come back to standard and even then you can shift modules in and out some if needed.

 

jeff

Link to comment

Yes 3" would not do it. Although you can do transition modules with gradients on either side! Or do your own freemo loop, not all Ttrak needs to interop you can always have a table with an alternative idea going on.

 

jeff

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Kiha66 said:

I was wondering about those lower road bridges, I guess just blocking them off a few times a year is a lot cheaper than a proper span.

Well that said bridge is now gone.

 

59d5fe2ba2652_bridgegone.thumb.JPG.229a868e31d361a64325ab8cd350cda8.JPG

Link to comment
bikkuri bahn

The bridge is officially called the No. 4 Yamato River Bridge [第四大和川橋梁].  The construction method is due to the fact that the line crosses the river at 30 degrees on a 400m radius curve, and the north side has both a rocky outcropping and a national highway running on the valley/cliff face, so conventional piers couldn't be located where they typically would be.  The river flow is also a factor, of course.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...